YOUR QUESTION:
07/01/2021 Paige Omidi
Hi Trevor,
I'd like to get your insight as to why certain musicians, who are painstaking when it comes to their mastering on the CD format, often don't have the same quality control with their vinyl versions.
For instance, I've seen many examples of even homemade albums, where it's still clear that they put considerable effort into the mixing and mastering process (and it produces beautiful results), but then they issue vinyl versions of those same records, I find myself disappointed with the sound quality and comparison. I realize not all musicians have access to a perfect analog mastering process, but it doesn't seem like it's completely an economic decision, so I was curious if you could explain this to me a bit. Thank you
MY ANSWER:
I can’t answer that for you but I can speculate. Firstly, vinyl, as much as I love it and still collect used copies, just doesn’t sound as good. There’s always going to be less accuracy and more noise with vinyl. It’s quite possible some musicians don’t realize that vinyl needs a separate treatment in mastering. Musicians aren’t always known for their economic decisions. But maybe I’m skirting the point here. Depending on the music, some vinyl sounds amazing, but I gotta be honest and say that I don’t totally understand the fairly recent resurgence of vinyl. It’s still a pain in the ass to lug around, for one. Anyway, ultimately, I can’t speak to why some masters sound worse than others. I think mastering engineers are underappreciated and it’s important to hire the best.